<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>dotlizard dot comequal rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dotlizard.com/posts/tag/equal-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dotlizard.com</link>
	<description>here we are, trapped in the amber of the moment. there is no why.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:33:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<cloud domain='dotlizard.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Loving v. Virginia</title>
		<link>http://dotlizard.com/posts/2008/11/loving-v-virginia/</link>
		<comments>http://dotlizard.com/posts/2008/11/loving-v-virginia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lizard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[the fundamental interconnectedness of all things]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proposition 8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dotlizard.com/?p=1915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[isn&#8217;t that a great name for a Supreme Court case? i thought so. what i thought even more amazing was this text, from the decision: Marriage is one of the ‘basic civil rights of man,’ fundamental to our very existence and survival…. To deny this fundamental freedom on so unsupportable a basis as the racial [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:right;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"><a href="http://www.google.com/reader/link?url=http://dotlizard.com/posts/2008/11/loving-v-virginia/&title=Loving v. Virginia&srcTitle=dotlizard dot com&srcURL=http://dotlizard.com" onclick="return call_google_buzz('http://www.google.com/reader/link?url=http://dotlizard.com/posts/2008/11/loving-v-virginia/&title=Loving v. Virginia&srcTitle=dotlizard dot com&srcURL=http://dotlizard.com')" rel=""><img style="background:none;border:0px;padding-top:0px;" border="0" src="http://dotlizard.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-google-buzz/icon/12.png" style="opacity:1;filter:alpha(opacity=100)" onmouseover="this.style.opacity=0.8;this.filters.alpha.opacity=70" onmouseout="this.style.opacity=1;this.filters.alpha.opacity=100"/> </a></div>
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_mustard" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fdotlizard.com%252Fposts%252F2008%252F11%252Floving-v-virginia%252F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Loving%20v.%20Virginia%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p>isn&#8217;t that a great name for a Supreme Court case? i thought so.</p>
<p>what i thought even more amazing was this text, from the decision:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Marriage is one of the ‘basic civil rights of man,’ fundamental to our very existence and survival…. To deny this fundamental freedom on so unsupportable a basis as the racial classifications embodied in these statutes, classifications so directly subversive of the principle of equality at the heart of the Fourteenth Amendment, is surely to deprive all the State’s citizens of liberty without due process of law. The Fourteenth Amendment requires that the freedom of choice to marry not be restricted by invidious racial discriminations. Under our Constitution, the freedom to marry, or not to marry, a person of another race resides with the individual and cannot be infringed by the State. </em></p></blockquote>
<p>and with that, in 1964, the Racial Integrity Act of 1924 was overturned, once and for all. the anti-miscegenation laws are now far behind us, but do you know that until 1991, we would not have had a voting majority to agree. i&#8217;m very glad that interracial couples did not have to wait until 1991 for the general public (who are notorious assholes, as a group) to agree that it was ok for them to have this &#8216;basic civil right&#8217;.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/865962@N20/pool/"><img title="equal rights should NEVER be subjected to a public vote" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3275/3033683428_a498697aca.jpg" alt="equal rights should NEVER be subjected to a public vote" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>
<p>quote, and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_v._Virginia">Supreme Court case</a>, discovered reading <a href="http://robotmonkeypants.com/2008/11/05/to-quote-the-great-ralph-wiggum-im-happy-and-angry/">Robot Monkey Pants</a>.</p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dotlizard.com/posts/2008/11/loving-v-virginia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

